Tag Archives: ELC-E 2016

Using ELBE to Build Debian Based Embedded Systems – Manuel Traut, Linutronix

When building for embedded systems, you don’t want to create and maintain yet another distro (yocto, buildroot), but rely on the maintainers of an existing one, e.g. Debian.

Continue reading

Linux DRM: New Picture Processing API – Marek Szyprowski, Samsung Electronics Polska

DRM = Direct Rendering Manager = framework for display related drivers. Samsung wants to extend it with support for some picture processing steps.

Continue reading

Open-Source Tools for FPGA Development – Marek Vašut, DENX Software Engineering

What tools are needed for FPGA development, and what is available in open source? Why is there so little in open source?

Continue reading

GPIO for Engineers and Makers – Linus Walleij

Linus is the maintainer of the GPIO subsystem. What has happened since the gpiolib subsystem was introduced in 2006?

Continue reading

Update on Shared Logging between the Kernel and the Bootloader – Sean Hudson, Mentor Graphics, Inc

This is an update of the talk Sean gave in Dublin ELC-E 2015. Sean revived the shared logging work from earlier implementations. Shared logging means that the kernel can access the logs of the bootloader and vice versa, and this over multiple boot cycles. A debugging tool for helping to debug the boot.

Continue reading

Modernizing the NAND Framework: The Big Picture – Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons

Boris is working on various aspects of MTD (NAND drivers, UBI, UBIFS) and is reworking some of the infrastructure. With this talk, he wants to explain his plans and get feedback on them.

Continue reading

The Internet of Things and Life Beyond Linux – Wolfgang Mauerer, Technical University Regensburg/Siemens AG

What are the changes that Linux has to face to deal with IoT devices? What alternatives to Linux are usable today (i.e., open source :-).


Continue reading

Using SCHED_DEADLINE – Steven Rostedt, Red Hat

Different scheduling classes:

  • SCHED_OTHER: fair scheduling, uses nice value
  • SCHED_FIFO: the usual RT scheduler. Fixed priorities, tasks with the same priority get first come, first serve.
  • SCHED_RR: just there for POSIX reasons, it’s useless, it’s not really deterministic. E.g. if 3 tasks with the same RR priority are spread out over 2 CPUs, then one task will get 100% of 1 CPU and the other two will get 50% of the other CPU.

Example of SCHED_DEADLINE: imagine a controller for a nuclear power plant that needs .5s every 1s, a washing machine that requires 50ms every 200ms. With SCHED_FIFO, you should give the washing machine higher priority. If you give the power plant higher priority, the washing machine will certainly miss its deadline during the .5s that the power plant is busy. OTOH if the washing machine has highest priority, both processes will get their deadlines. This is Rate Monotonic Scheduling. However, with RMS, the maximum allowed utilisation is way less than 100%, to allow all possible orderings for when the tasks start. For infinite number of tasks, the maximum utilisation converges to 70%. See the slides or video for a nice graphical example.

Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling on the other hand is guaranteed to meet deadlines as long as utilisation is < 100%.

For implementing SCHED_DEADLINE, new syscalls had to be added: sched_getattr and sched_setattr. The syscalls have a size and a flags parameter for future extensions. The sched_attr struct has the usual sched fields like sched_policy, and also sched_runtime, sched_deadline and sched_period. These fields are in nanoseconds. However, if better resolution than 1ms is needed, you need to turn on SCHED_HRTIMERS in /proc/sys. sched_setattr will fail if the deadlines of everything together can’t be met.

sched_yield(): most use cases are buggy. In SCHED_OTHER it just gives up the current CPU time slice. In SCHED_OTHER/SCHED_RR, it allows a task of the same priority to run. E.g.  it doesn’t work to use sched_yield() in a pthread_mutex_trylock() loop to break deadlocks when taking two locks. In SCHED_DEADLINE, however, sched_yield() has a use: it tells the kernel that the current period is done so the next deadline process can get the CPU. The sched_yield in this case will sleep until the period set in sched_attr expires.

If the deadline is not equal to the period (which is often the case), then the maximum CPU utilisation should consider only the deadlines, because multiple tasks may trigger at the same time and need to satisfy the same deadline.

In multiprocessors, EDF can only guarantee deadlines if the total utilisation is smaller than 1, i.e. it doesn’t really use the multiplce CPUs. That’s because all the earliest deadline tasks may occupy all the CPUs for a relatively short time, but which leaves insufficient time for a longer-running task. It’s similar to the different periods.

One solution is to partition tasks over the CPUs and lock them on a particular (set of) CPUs. However, optimal partitioning is an NP-complete problem so not usable for a scheduler.

However, special cases can be guaranteed with global EDF, by looking at the maximum per-task utilisation. That’s why sched_runtime is there, to verify the global utilisation.

Limits of SCHED_DEADLINE: You can’t specify partial affinity otherwise the global scheduling no longer works. You should account for migration overheads in the runtime. You can’t fork because the schedule of the tasks has been fixed. You have to specify the absolute worst case execution time for the runtime, which can be very much worse than the typical execution time.

To use affinities with SCHED_DEADLINE, you have to create two mutually exclusive cpusets which internally have load balancing and then turn off global load balancing. Steven has some C code that does this, but it’s not nice.

On the way to mainline: Greedy Reclaim of Unused Bandwidth: if there is still unused CPU time, SCHED_DEADLINE tasks can use it even if they are already above their runtime limit. This allows for WCETs that have occasional spikes above sched_runtime.

SCHED_DEADLINE is also a way to control the CPU bandwidth of a process: when the budget runs out, the process gets throttled until its period comes up again – and this is guaranteed up-front when the task is started.

Reconfigurable Computing Architecture for the Linux Kernel – Vince Bridgers & Yves Vandervennet, Intel (ex-Altera)

Heterogeneous programming: offload work to specialised cores. For Altera (now Intel PSG), this includes FPGAs. The kernel needs to support this.

Continue reading

Running UBI/UBIFS on MLC NAND – Richard Weinberger, sigma star & Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons

MLC NAND flashes bring a lot of new problems that have to be solved in the kernel, in the MTD layer, in UBI, in UBIFS.

Continue reading